In a response to a Twitter person asking concerning the layoffs, Musk tweeted: “That is false.”
The New York Occasions reported on Saturday that Musk has ordered job cuts throughout the corporate, with some groups to be trimmed greater than others and that layoffs would happen earlier than Nov. 1 date, when workers had been scheduled to obtain inventory grants as a part of their compensation.
Citing unidentified individuals aware of the matter, the Occasions reported the cuts might start as quickly as Saturday.
In keeping with media stories on Saturday, Musk fired prime executives in an effort to keep away from hefty severance payouts, whereas lining up different layoffs as quickly as Saturday.
Musk fired Twitter Chief Govt Parag Agrawal, Chief Monetary Officer Ned Segal and authorized affairs and coverage chief Vijaya Gadde on completion of a high-profile $44 billion buyout of the social media platform on Thursday, individuals aware of the matter informed Reuters.
He had accused them of deceptive him and Twitter traders over the variety of pretend accounts on the platform. In keeping with analysis agency Equilar, the executives stood to obtain separation payouts totaling some $122 million.
Citing unidentified individuals aware of the matter, The Info reported that Elon Musk terminated 4 prime Twitter executives, together with Agrawal and Segal “for trigger,” in an obvious effort to keep away from severance pay and unvested inventory awards.
In a tweet on Saturday LightShed analyst Wealthy Greenfield stated Musk fired prime Twitter execs “for trigger,” stopping their unvested inventory from vesting as a part of a change of management.
Twitter didn’t instantly reply to Reuters’ request for remark.
Reuters wasn’t instantly in a position to contact the fired executives.
Director of analysis at Equilar Courtney Yu informed Reuters on Friday that the fired executives “must be getting these (severance) funds except Elon Musk had trigger for termination, with trigger in these circumstances often being that they broke the legislation or violated firm coverage.”